9/8/2023 0 Comments Judicial decisionsOf judicial review, human rights and EU jurisprudence. But it is also because judges are being asked to determine more public policy issues, with the growth This is partly attributable to the increasedĮase of communication. And our work is now beingĭiscussed far more by politicians, journalists, and indeed members of the public. More importantly, the work of judges is subject to scrutiny by academics more than ever before. I suppose a judge’s attitude in this connection reflects the extent to which he believes in his own infallibility. That some judges seem to enjoy having their earlier judgments read back to them in later cases, whereas others dislike it. This doubt is often promptedīy arguments in subsequent cases, as our past decisions are analysed and their alleged failings exposed. Most of us are likely to look on some of our past decisions on issues of law, and experience doubt. However, I suspect that few if any judges (not even the writer of the email) believe themselves to be infallible if anything, (I don’t really do anxiety - it is one of my many failings)”. My colleague wrote, “ an intensive review while yours isĪn anxious one. Which came to the same conclusion, on an appeal. Is well illustrated by an email I received from a colleague (whom I shall not identify) after we had exchanged draft judgments, Inevitably, the level of doubt will vary with individual temperament. That does not mean that judgesĭo not have doubts while reaching their decisions. Go just alike, yet each believes his own.Įvery judge, almost by definition, “believes his own”, at least when he gives his judgment. ’Tis with our Judgments as our Watches, none
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |